YOU WON’T BELIEVE THESE 10 STORIES FROM HISTORY

Who said history was boring? These are the most unbelievable stories from all time that you definitely weren’t taught in school!

Mysteries

From a chicken that lived for two years without its head to an American project to blow up the moon, here are 10 unbelievable facts from history.

1. Mike the Headless Chicken

Back in 1945, a chicken destined for the chop miraculously survived the farmer’s axe and ran around without a head for the next two years.

The farmer and his new headless chicken (now named Mike) soon left their farm in Fruita, Colorado and hit the road showcasing the unbelievable sight of a walking, breathing headless chicken to all those willing to pay a fee.

People from across America gawked and stared at Mike, whilst scientists poked and prodded him to try and understand exactly how he was still alive. The answer lay in the positioning of a chicken’s brain, which is situated in the back of their heads. Whilst the farmer chopped off most of Mike’s head, much of his brain was left intact. A fortunate blood clot then prevented Mike from bleeding to death.

In the end, Mike choked to death in 1947 after mucus became stuck in his throat.

A sculpture of 'Mike the Headless Chicken'

Read more about Mysteries

The unbelievable story of ‘Mike the Headless Chicken’

2. Wojtek the Bear

For thousands of years, animals have aided humans in the field of combat. However, bears are not always the first creatures to come to mind when thinking of animals in war. A Syrian brown bear adopted as a cub by Polish soldiers during WWII is the standout exception to the rule.

Named Wojtek, the bear grew up within the 22nd Artillery Supply Company and formed a close bond with the soldiers. They even shared their cigarettes and beer with him. Wojtek grew into a 40-stone adult and was officially enlisted into the army to secure his rations.

The bear rose from the rank of private to corporal after his exploits during the Battle of Monte Cassino in Italy in May 1944. Wojtek allegedly helped carry ammunition crates to the soldiers on the frontline.

Wojtek survived the war and lived out his days at Edinburgh Zoo.

Polish scouts stand next to a Wojtek the Soldier Bear memorial in Edinburgh in 2015

Read more about WW1

6 stories of animals that went to war

3. America’s project to nuke the moon

As unfathomable as it sounds, the Americans really did consider sending a nuclear missile towards the moon. And for what purpose you ask? Well, to prevent the Soviets from getting one-up on them.

Ever since the end of WWII, the two countries were locked in an ever-escalating nuclear arms race that evolved into a Space Race. The Soviets got off to the quickest start with the launch of Sputnik 1 in 1957, Earth’s first artificial satellite.

Fearing they might fall behind further, American top brass wanted a show of strength, so the U.S. Air Force began Project A119, aka Project Nuke The Moon. The Air Force wanted a mushroom cloud so large it would be visible from Earth as the ultimate display of one-upmanship on the Soviets.

Fortunately for all of mankind, the project was canned in favour of the moon landings.

Dan Aykroyd

Read more about Shows

‘There are stories here that truly defy belief’: Dan Aykroyd on his ‘Unbelievable’ new show

4. Posthumous execution of Oliver Cromwell

History tells us that Oliver Cromwell, Lord Protector of England during the country’s brief stint as a republic, died of complications due to malaria and kidney stone disease. How then, did his chopped-off head end up in private collections and museums for centuries to come?

Well, after his death, the country decided to ditch the republic and asked Charles II to return to England and restore the Stuart monarchy in 1660. Charles returned, but not without a serious grudge against Cromwell and all those who’d executed his father.

Charles put together a kill list with a series of most wanted names on it. One of which was Cromwell but since he was already dead, the next best thing to enact revenge was to have him exhumed and posthumously executed.

Cromwell’s head was stuck on a spike in Westminster Hall for the next 30 years. It then spent 250-odd years being bought and sold by various collectors until it was finally buried in 1960 at Sidney Sussex College in Cambridge.

King Charles II

Read more about British History

The wrath of a king: How Charles II avenged the ‘regicides’ with his ‘Royal Kill List’

5. Henry I died after eating too many lampreys

As weird deaths go, this one is right up there. King Henry I, who reigned from 1100 until his untimely demise in 1135, had something of a penchant for eating lampreys. The jawless eel-like fish is as strange looking as it is ancient, with fossils of the creature dating back to the age of the dinosaurs.

Although they have been described as tasty, it’s not the kind of dish usually eaten in large volumes. Henry I begged to differ. His insatiable appetite for lampreys impacted his health so much that he eventually died after a night of voracious feasting.

One theory suggests a toxin from the lampreys was the reason for Henry’s death since the physician who extracted his brain post-mortem reportedly became ill afterwards and died a painful death a few days later.

Portrait of Queen Elizabeth

Read more about Kings and Queens

The 8 weirdest British monarch deaths in history

6. The Dancing Plague of 1518

Whilst ‘Strictly’ fever grips the nation every winter, back in 16th century France, a dancing plague brought hundreds of people to their feet to dance until they could stand no more.

In one of the strangest episodes in European history, the 1518 Dancing Plague of Strasbourg saw a spontaneous outbreak of dancing grip the local populace. Up to 400 people danced day and night until they collapsed, with some perhaps even dying from exhaustion.

What could cause people to get up and quite literally dance the skin off their feet? Historians have debated the reason behind the dancing plague, but the consensus seems to be that it was caused by stress-induced mass hysteria.

An engraving by Pieter Brueghel the Elder showing three women afflicted with the plague | Wikipedia | Public Domain

Read more about Mysteries

The mystery of the dancing plague of 1518

7. Phineas Gage who survived a rod through the brain

In 1848, blasting foreman Phineas Gage was clearing rock in Vermont, as part of the advance team of railway workers prepping the line for the Rutland and Burlington Railroad.

After packing a hole with gunpowder, Gage proceeded to tamper it down with sand. To do that he used a four-foot-long iron rod shaped like a javelin. Unfortunately, the rod caused a spark and ignited the gunpowder, firing said rod through Gage’s left cheek and out through the top of his head.

Although Gage lost a significant amount of blood and brain matter, he not only survived the accident but went on to live for another 12 years. However, his personality changed from an affable, likeable man to an impatient and often violent one.

The case of Phineas Gage proved invaluable to the study of neuroscience, as scientists made the connection for the first time between brain injury and personality change.

Colourised image of Phineas Gage holding the iron rod

Read more about Mysteries

How did Phineas Gage survive an iron rod shooting through his brain?

8. Franz Reichelt, the inventor killed by his own invention

At the beginning of the 19th century, mankind had finally taken to the skies with the invention of the aeroplane. However, in the early days of flight, there wasn’t a way for aviators to abandon their plane safety if it came into trouble.

Austrian-Hungarian tailor Franz Reichelt wanted to find the solution. And so, he invented a suit that he believed could work as a parachute. After many failed attempts on dummies out of his fifth-floor apartment in Paris, Reichelt thought he just needed more height for his parachute to work.

And so, Reichelt donned the suit, climbed to the first platform of the Eiffel Tower and jumped. Sadly, the parachute failed to deploy and he fell 187 feet to his death.

Franz Reichelt wearing his parachute suit

Read more about Modern History

8 inventors who were killed by their inventions

9. When Americans and Germans fought on the same side in WWII

During the dying days of WWII, a small medieval castle in the Austrian Alps became the backdrop to one of the war’s strangest and most unlikely battles. The Nazis had converted Castle Itter into a prison to house a variety of VIP prisoners, including a French tennis star and the sister of Charles de Gaulle.

By 4th May 1945, the Nazi guards had fled, leaving the remaining 14 prisoners free to leave. However, the area was still crawling with SS and as bad luck would have it, one unit was heading their way to execute them.

Help came in the unlikely form of Joseg Gangl, a highly decorated Wehrmacht Major who had become disillusioned with Nazi ideology. When a nearby US tank battalion agreed to help Gangl and his handful of troops defend the prison, Americans and Germans found themselves fighting side-by-side, the only recorded case during the whole war.

Wojtek the bear with a Polish soldier

Read more about WW2

22 little known facts about WWII 

The ensuing Battle for Castle Itter saw the defenders successfully repel the SS with just one casualty, Josef Gangl himself.

10. Charles VI who believed he was made of glass

Medieval French King Charles VI suffered from a condition known as ‘glass delusion’, whereby he believed he was made of glass and could quite literally shatter if not careful. Whilst it’s not an affliction we are aware of today, the condition was not uncommon in Europe between the 15th and 17th centuries.

Charles would often refuse to be touched by anyone for fear of shattering. He put iron rods in his clothes to protect himself from falling and breaking. On one occasion, he was even reported to have wrapped himself in blankets to prevent his buttocks from cracking.

A heartfelt poem for Father’s Day Benjamin David

A FATHER’S LOVE….

You’ve shown me strength, you’ve shown me grace,
A guiding hand, a smiling face.
Through childhood’s games and lessons learned,
Your love’s a flame, forever burned. 

You taught me courage, to stand up tall,
And face the world, answering freedom’s call.
Your wisdom shared, a precious gift,
Helped me navigate, gave my spirit lift. 

A hero’s heart, a gentle soul,
You make me whole, you make me bold.
For all you do, and all you are,
You’re my guiding light, my shining star. 

This Father’s Day, I honor you,
For all the love, forever true.
Thank you, Dad, for all you’ve done,
My best friend, my hero, my number one. 

3 responsibilities every government has towards its citizens

The oldest and simplest justification for government is as protector: protecting citizens from violence.

Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan describes a world of unrelenting insecurity without a government to provide the safety of law and order, protecting citizens from each other and from foreign foes. The horrors of little or no government to provide that function are on global display in the world’s many fragile states and essentially ungoverned regions. And indeed, when the chaos of war and disorder mounts too high, citizens will choose even despotic and fanatic governments, such as the Taliban and ISIS, over the depredations of warring bands.

The idea of government as protector requires taxes to fund, train and equip an army and a police force; to build courts and jails; and to elect or appoint the officials to pass and implement the laws citizens must not break. Regarding foreign threats, government as protector requires the ability to meet and treat with other governments as well as to fight them. This minimalist view of government is clearly on display in the early days of the American Republic, comprised of the President, Congress, Supreme Court and departments of Treasury, War, State and Justice.

Protect and provide

The concept of government as provider comes next: government as provider of goods and services that individuals cannot provide individually for themselves. Government in this conception is the solution to collective action problems, the medium through which citizens create public goods that benefit everyone, but that are also subject to free-rider problems without some collective compulsion.

The basic economic infrastructure of human connectivity falls into this category: the means of physical travel, such as roads, bridges and ports of all kinds, and increasingly the means of virtual travel, such as broadband. All of this infrastructure can be, and typically initially is, provided by private entrepreneurs who see an opportunity to build a road, say, and charge users a toll, but the capital necessary is so great and the public benefit so obvious that ultimately the government takes over.

A more expansive concept of government as provider is the social welfare state: government can cushion the inability of citizens to provide for themselves, particularly in the vulnerable conditions of youth, old age, sickness, disability and unemployment due to economic forces beyond their control. As the welfare state has evolved, its critics have come to see it more as a protector from the harsh results of capitalism, or perhaps as a means of protecting the wealthy from the political rage of the dispossessed. At its best, however, it is providing an infrastructure of care to enable citizens to flourish socially and economically in the same way that an infrastructure of competition does. It provides a social security that enables citizens to create their own economic security.

The future of government builds on these foundations of protecting and providing. Government will continue to protect citizens from violence and from the worst vicissitudes of life. Government will continue to provide public goods, at a level necessary to ensure a globally competitive economy and a well-functioning society. But wherever possible, government should invest in citizen capabilities to enable them to provide for themselves in rapidly and continually changing circumstances.

Not surprisingly, this vision of government as investor comes from a deeply entrepreneurial culture. Technology reporter Gregory Ferenstein has polled leading Silicon Valley entrepreneurs and concluded that they “want the government to be an investor in citizens, rather than as a protector from capitalism. They want the government to heavily fund education, encourage more active citizenship, pursue binding international trade alliances and open borders to all immigrants.” In the words of Alphabet Chairman Eric Schmidt: “The combination of innovation, empowerment and creativity will be our solution.”

This celebration of human capacity is a welcome antidote to widespread pessimism about the capacity of government to meet current national and global economic, security, demographic and environmental challenges. Put into practice, however, government as investor will mean more than simply funding schools and opening borders. If government is to assume that in the main citizens can solve themselves more efficiently and effectively than government can provide for them, it will have to invest not only in the cultivation of citizen capabilities, but also in the provision of the resources and infrastructure to allow citizens to succeed at scale.

Have you read?

Invest in talent

The most important priority of government as investor is indeed education, but education cradle-to-grave. The first five years are particularly essential, as the brain development in those years determines how well children will be able to learn and process what they learn for the rest of their lives. The government will thus have to invest in an entire infrastructure of child development from pregnancy through the beginning of formal schooling, including child nutrition and health, parenting classes, home visits and developmentally appropriate early education programmes. The teenage years are another period of brain development where special programmes, coaching and family support are likely to be needed. Investment in education will fall on barren ground if brains are not capable of receiving and absorbing it. Moreover, meaningful opportunities for continuing education must be available to citizens over the course of their lives, as jobs change rapidly and the acquisition of knowledge accelerates.

Even well-educated citizens, however, cannot live up to their full potential as creative thinkers and makers unless they have resources to work with. Futurists and business consultants John Hagel III, John Seeley Brown and Lang Davison argue in The Power of Pull that successful enterprises no longer design a product according to abstract specifications and push it out to customers, but rather provide a platform where individuals can find what they need and connect to whom they need to be successful. If government really wishes to invest in citizen talent, it will have to provide the same kind of “product” – platforms where citizens can shop intelligently and efficiently for everything from health insurance to educational opportunities to business licenses and potential business partners. Those platforms cannot simply be massive data dumps; they must be curated, designed and continually updated for a successful customer/citizens experience.

Finally, government as investor will have to find a way to be anti-scale. The normal venture capitalist approach to investment is to expect nine ventures to fail and one to take off and scale up. For government, however, more small initiatives that engage more citizens productively and happily are better than a few large ones. Multiple family restaurants in multiple towns are better than a few large national chains. Woven all together, citizen-enterprise in every conceivable area can create a web of national economic enterprise and at least a good part of a social safety net. But government is likely to have to do the weaving.

A government that believes in the talent and potential of its citizens and devote a large portion of its tax revenues to investing in its citizens to help them reach that potential is an attractive vision. It avoids the slowness and bureaucracy of direct government provision of services, although efficient government units can certainly compete. It recognizes that citizens are quicker and more creative at responding to change and coming up with new solutions.

But government investment will have to recognize and address the changing needs of citizens over their entire lifetimes, provide platforms to help them get the resources and make the connections they need, and see a whole set of public goods created by the sum of their deliberately many parts.

Christians and Politics: 5 Principles for Christian Interaction with the Political World

What should the relationship between Christians and politics look like? Here are five guiding principles for choosing faithful Christian engagement when it comes to politics: Remember your most primary citizenship. Choose to be influenced by theology over ideology. Prioritize Christian witness over political power. Choose influence over susceptibility. Trust in God instead of giving into panic. 

As a minister who leads a church, I’m frequently asked difficult questions. I don’t mind tough questions. In fact, there are times I enjoy the challenging task of puzzling out an answer to an objection to something I have said, a theological or doctrinal quandary, or something similar. One of the most difficult questions I have faced the last few years—and maybe you can identify here—is where Christians ought to stand politically. This question can take a few different shapes. Maybe you have heard one of these. Should Christians be involved in the political sphere at all? Should we vote when neither candidate seems to hold to Christ-like values? What if one candidate seems to represent much of what you value ideologically, but there is an obvious moral disconnect? Is there one issue that outweighs all others when voting?

These can be difficult questions. And if I’m honest, I have often found myself struggling to find clear answers. How do you feel when faced with a nagging question and you simply can’t find a satisfying answer? The question doesn’t go away with quick (often one-sided) answers; often the nagging only increases in intensity. I would like to suggest an alternative approach to the one we often default to, one that has arisen out of personal experience and effort as I’ve tried to address a variety of difficult issues. Here’s where I’ve landed, and I hope it’s helpful to you too: When you can’t find definite answers, search instead for guiding principles.


“When you can’t find definite answers, search instead for guiding principles.”


Here’s what is different about this principle-based approach and why I think it is so applicable to the questions we Christians face when engaging in politics. Answers are focused on solving a problem. If you satisfactorily answer the question, you’ve resolved the issue. Principles, however, are what we employ as we try to navigate our way through an ongoing problem or issue. And, as it relates to politics, we should acknowledge that the question of how to engage is not one that can be neatly resolved, but it is one we must wisely navigate.

With this in mind, I would like to present you with five principles that I believe will be helpful to disciples of Jesus who have wrestled and will continue to wrestle with the difficult question concerning the how of political engagement. Here I will also show my hand, in that I am not arguing for non-involvement, but rather wise and faithful engagement. Therefore, it is my hope that these principles will allow you to navigate these strange times with wisdom and faithfulness.

Principle 1: Choose Kingdom over Nation

To a people who were wrestling with questions equally difficult to the ones we face today, the apostle Paul famously said, “Our citizenship is in heaven” (Philippians 3:20). I wonder just how compelling that idea is to most of us. My guess is that many of us treat Paul’s words not as a concrete statement of fact, but as an abstract and perhaps aspirational idea. But Paul was plain in his words to the Philippians. To him, citizenship in heaven was not wishful thinking, or a far-off promise, but a very present and transformative reality. Jesus was equally plain as He stood on trial before the Roman governor Pontius Pilate and declared, “My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders. But now my kingdom is from another place” (John 18:36).


Christians and Politics: “As followers of Jesus, we are first and foremost to be a not-of-this-world kind of people.”


As followers of Jesus, we are first and foremost to be a not-of-this-world kind of people. Our heavenly citizenship should be what defines us more than anything else we might be tempted to root our identity in. I am an American, but I am first a citizen of heaven. Someone may think, Isn’t that the perspective most Christians already have? After all, as the saying goes, “God, family, country.” Right? And yet, our value system isn’t always in the order we like to think. Which keeps you up more at night: the direction of the country or the advance of God’s kingdom? Which animates your conversations more: what this or that politician just did or what God is doing?

My identity as a follower of Jesus should compel me to think of myself first as a citizen of heaven and then acknowledge that I also have an earthly place of residence. For me, it’s a little more complicated because I have dual earthly citizenship with one American parent and one European. Yet even for me, if there is ever a question of my most fundamental allegiance, the answer to that question is easy because I’m first and foremost a citizen of God’s kingdom.

So how does this choice of kingdom over nation affect us practically? Here are a few quick thoughts: We should recognize in the words of Peter, that no matter where we live, the reality that we are citizens of heaven means that we are exiles, strangers, and foreigners (1 Peter 1:11, 1 Peter 2:11) in our land of residence. This should raise another question. Just how should an exile, stranger, or foreigner relate to his or her country of residence? For some guidance here, the words of the Old Testament prophet, Jeremiah, will be useful. Writing on behalf of God to the exiled people of Israel Jeremiah says, “Seek the peace and prosperity of the city to which I have carried you into exile. Pray to the Lord for it, because if it prospers, you too will prosper” (Jer. 29:7).


Christians and Politics: “Seek the peace and prosperity of the city to which I have carried you into exile. Pray to the Lord for it, because if it prospers, you too will prosper.”


We should seek the peace and prosperity of the country in which we live. We should pray for it. We should pray for the leaders of that nation—as the apostle Paul also instructs in Romans 13. These are the wise and faithful actions of a wise and faithful people. Our kingdom-first identity might frustrate those who want us to be reliably on their side of political issues no matter what. Even as we may frustrate people, when we live out that identity, we will bless the nation in which we reside. But we should also be careful. Situations will arise that call into question our ultimate allegiance. And when this happens, we must know where we stand.

Principle 2: Choose Theology Over Ideology

The Oxford Languages Dictionary defines theology as “the study of the nature of God and religious belief.” You might say that theology at a very practical level involves the thoughts we have about God. In this sense we are all theologians to some degree. In contrast, The Oxford Languages Dictionary defines ideology as “a system of ideas and ideals, especially one which forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy.” Ideology, then, is a lens through which we look at the problems of the world around us, especially political and economic ones, and the way in which we propose, in theory, to resolve those problems.

When I say we should choose theology over ideology, what I’m not saying is that there is something inherently wrong with ideology. What I am saying is that if you choose to give yourself to a particular political or economic ideology, it’s very possible that it begins to shape your worldview more than the Bible does. Your ideology might very well change your biblical views to be more in line with whatever social subculture you most gravitate toward. Because it can be difficult to tell exactly what is at the heart of a particular political ideology, we as followers of Jesus should exercise wisdom as we sort through the confusion of a complex political system. And for those of us who follow Jesus, our starting point should always be Scripture.


Christians and Politics: “For those of us who follow Jesus, our starting point should always be Scripture.”


We must be people who value the wisdom of God—however foolish the world may tell us we are—over the wisdom of the world. Even as we face with pushback, sometimes ridicule, and possibly even persecution, we should allow some of those same words to reassure us about the rightness of the path we have chosen. Consider for example these words from Isaiah 55:8-9: “’For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,’ declares the Lord. ‘As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.”’ Or, from 1 Corinthians 3:19: “’For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in God’s sight. As it is written: ‘He catches the wise in their craftiness.’” Ultimately, as disciples of Jesus, we must be a people whose thoughts begin and end with him. That will make us different, but this is a good thing.

Principle 3: Choose Christian Witness Over Political Power

In 2 Corinthians 5:20, the apostle Paul states that Christians are God’s ambassadors in the world. This is a heavy thought that we should absorb for a moment before moving on. In all I do, as a follower of Jesus, I am called to be a representative of God’s truth in this world. This is also true for you if you have given your life to Jesus.

This means that as we live as citizens of heaven and ambassadors of God’s kingdom, at times we should expect to find ourselves at odds with the kingdoms and nations in which we live. This is especially the case when a state expands beyond, or fails to live up to, its God-given roles of bringing order and exercising justice. We should expect to find ourselves at odds with leading political parties, and often popular politicians as well. As I contemplate this, a difficult question wells up in me. Just how intertwined can I be with any of this world’s systems and still be a faithful witness to God?


Christians and Politics: “Just how intertwined can I be with any of this world’s systems and still be a faithful witness to God?”


As I write that last sentence, I will acknowledge that many who don’t believe in the existence of God still stumble upon things that are good and right. We should expect this, as the idea of common grace is quite valid. The good that one party represents will and should draw us in. But what do we do when that same party stands for something that is truly reprehensible in the eyes of God? In his recent book Live No Lies, John Mark Comer presents “five distinctive features of the early church which he argues caused Christianity to stand out boldly against the cultural systems of the Roman empire in the first three centuries.[1] I will summarize those quickly here:

  1. The Church was an ethnically diverse group and valued people of varying cultural backgrounds, extending them dignity in accord with their creation.
  2. The Church was an economically diverse group and included, sometimes even elevated, those who were poor and outcast.
  3. The Church stood in strong opposition to the practices of infanticide and abortion.
  4. The Church embraced a radical sexual ethic, believing that God had called them to sexual faithfulness and purity, and to honor Biblical marriage well.
  5. The Church embraced a stance of nonviolence, as Comer indicates, on both “a personal and political level.”

Christians and Politics: “The Church was an ethnically diverse group and valued people of varying cultural backgrounds, extending them dignity in accord with their creation.”


Comer goes on to argue that if the Church were to re-embrace these five positions within our current political climate, the first two could put us at odds with conservative political ideology, the next two with liberal ideology, and the last would be an outlier that neither end of the political spectrum would likely embrace. But it was exactly this divergence from the values of the culture around them that enabled the Church to exist as such a powerful witness to the new family God was at work creating. Early Christians became a transformative witness to the goodness of God, even though they held almost no measurable political power until the process begun at the Edict of Milan issued by Constantine in the year 313.

I am concerned that many modern Christians value political power too highly, and when we do so, we run the risk of compromising Christian witness. Let me say once again that I am not advocating for non-involvement in the political system for those who follow Jesus. I am, however, advocating for a constant evaluation of the integrity of our Christian witness in relation to the degree in which Christians identify with the institutions of the world. The mission of Jesus, after all, has never been that of reforming the systems of the world through political revolution, but rather of partnering with God as he seeks to reconcile the world to Himself one redeemed soul at a time.


Christians and Politics: “The ultimate source of the brokenness we see in the world is not physical in nature, but spiritual.”


This understanding should never lead us to become aloof to the hurt and brokenness that is so rampant in the world around us, but it should lead us to recognize that the ultimate source of the brokenness we see in the world is not physical in nature, but spiritual. My plea to all followers of Jesus is ultimately this: let us never undervalue the power of true Christian witness, even when it places us in direct opposition to political ideology and practice.

Principle 4: Choose Influence Over Susceptibility

As we seek further guidance concerning Christian political engagement, we will once more turn to the words of the apostle Paul—specifically to some advice he gave the Corinthian church regarding their relationships with those who do not show obvious signs of following Christ. To illustrate his point, Paul used the image of two oxen plowing a field and in so doing, gave the Corinthians a wonderful metaphor that would have spoken volumes to people who lived in a predominately agricultural society.

While English translations of 2 Corinthians 6:14 tend to disagree on whether Paul told the Corinthians not to be yoked with unbelievers at all, or simply advised them about the danger of unequal yoking, this point is still clear: Any of us can be susceptible to ungodly influence depending on the partnerships we give ourselves over to. As followers of Jesus, we should search out positions of Christ-honoring influence, as opposed to allowing ourselves to be placed in settings in which we are sheep-like and impressionable.


Christians and Politics: “We should search out positions of Christ-honoring influence, as opposed to allowing ourselves to be placed in settings in which we are sheep-like and impressionable.”


A recent study released by the journal Political Psychology[2] points out just how far off track we can find ourselves when we neglect to heed the apostle Paul’s warning. In the study, the authors determined that many who voted for Donald Trump in the 2016 election were willing to revise their personal moral beliefs so that they aligned more closely to that of the candidate. To be clear, I am not making a judgment about any Christian who voted for Trump in the 2016 election, only pointing to a psychological phenomenon, something which no doubt can also be true of left-leaning Christians whose politics end up shaping their views of morality. Regarding 2016, a large percentage of the Republican voting base was made up of Christian evangelicals, who for years have held tightly to Bible-derived moral values. According to the results of the study, in 2016 with Trump as the nominee, many of those same evangelicals altered their long-held beliefs about the kind of candidate they were willing to vocally support. (And again, this is no free pass to those who lean leftward whose politics have also caused them to revise their reading of various passages of Scripture.)

Again, what is so unique about the findings of this study of 2016 is not that many who embraced conservative leanings voted for the Republican nominee. What stands out is that voters were willing to significantly alter their own moral beliefs to match those of the candidate they supported. As a result of this willingness to change to match the political winds, there are Christians willing to become “unequally yoked”—as evidenced by quite a few awkward appearances with politically active pastors (again, something seen on both sides of the political aisle), sometimes incoherent posts and rants on social media made by supporters of this or that politician, and the growing number of uncomfortable political and social alliances that emerge.


Christians and Politics: “You can hold your nose, but you don’t have to hold their water.”


With 2016 and now 2020 in the rearview mirror, the natural question becomes, “But what were Christians supposed to do given the choices the election presented them with?” That is a fair question. And to give an answer I’ve found helpful, I will share with you a phrase I have repeated many times during the last two election cycles: “You can hold your nose, but you don’t have to hold their water.” What I mean is this: Often, when talking with Christians about the choice between two balloted candidates, I have heard these words: “It is a choice of the lesser of two evils.” And that is often how I have felt when voting in recent memory.

So, when we step into the voting booth, faced with a difficult decision, we may have to choose the lesser of two evils—or as some have said, “hold our nose” while voting. I don’t at all begrudge anyone that, and frankly it makes sense. We are making the best of a far-from-perfect situation. What does not make sense is to become so susceptible to the influence of a political candidate that we choose to hold their water—a way of saying that we have become their servants, unequally yoked, and unrighteously influenced.

Principle 5: Choose Trust Over Panic

Ultimately, whoever is in office, we must remember that God is on His throne. This becomes more difficult to recall the more deeply we are invested in a particular political outcome. I can remember many Christians who thought the world was going to end when Barrack Obama was elected president of the United States. Eight years later, many believed we had finally reached Armageddon with the election of Donald Trump. Then when Joe Biden was elected in 2020, that was proof that the sky was finally falling. As I write this, we have moved into 2022, and unless we are living in some strange version of the Matrix, the world is still turning.

We are not the first people to have felt as though things were so bad, the world must be on the verge of coming to an end—nor even the first Christians to feel so. During the first century, persecution of Christians became so intense, that many were certain God would return shortly and put an end to their struggle.


Christians and Politics: “Paul provides them with specific instructions about how to conduct themselves in the face of a hostile governing authority.”


The apostle Paul writes his letter to the church in Rome during the beginning of the reign of the emperor Nero—who would go on to persecute Christians in terrible ways—and Paul provides them with specific instructions about how to conduct themselves in the face of a hostile governing authority. These words would go on to guide Christians for two thousand years of uncertain, often hostile times. He begins chapter 13 with this statement: “Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God” (Romans 13:1, NIV). How can we maintain this kind of peaceful confidence in the face of hostility (at a time when Christian persecution in certain places is at “near genocidal levels”)? It’s because we trust in God.

In a world prone to panic, Christians will stand out as we choose to exemplify what trust in God looks like in all situations. When we choose to make ourselves subject to governing authorities, even those with whom we disagree, we give testimony to our belief that God is in charge. When we join the world in panic, however, we tell an equally reverberant story. But our hope was never in a political leader, anyway—although admittedly some are easier to follow than others. Our hope has always been in God. Our current and future citizenship lies in His kingdom. And our allegiance belongs to Him, no matter what comes our way. We choose trust over panic.


Christians and Politics: “Our allegiance belongs to Him, no matter what comes our way. We choose trust over panic.”


So, again, how do we engage in politics as faithful followers of Jesus? When it comes to the crystal-clear answers we don’t have (whom to vote for, what party Jesus would align would, etc.), it’s helpful to be guided by biblical principles. These are the five biblical principles I want to encourage you to use to order (and perhaps reorder) your value system as a disciple of Jesus:

  1. Choose Kingdom over Nation
  2. Choose Theology over Ideology
  3. Choose Christian Witness over Political Power
  4. Choose Influence over Susceptibility
  5. Choose Trust over Panic

As I wrap up this article, I want to give you some encouragement. First, this world needs more principled people, not less. We won’t always find answers to difficult questions, but we can choose to live by wise and faithful guiding principles. Being principled will allow for, and even call us into, political involvement, but we will do so with the proper boundaries in place. I want to urge you as well to use wisdom every time you choose to make a politically charged post on social media. You never know who is reading your words and just how it may affect them.


Christians and Politics: “You never know who is reading your words and just how it may affect them.”


Your Christian witness matters more than you might imagine. And finally, never forget where your ultimate allegiance lies. This is a point on which I find myself in need of frequent evaluation. It is easier than ever to be drawn into the mud with the pigs, but Jesus calls us to something better. We are kingdom people. Don’t ever forget it.

WHAT MATTERS IN LIFE BY BENJAMIN DAVID

Most people don’t want to “do nothing’ all day. We have hopes and dreams, goals and ambitions. We want to contribute to the world, make it a better place, not “retire” from it to a life of “leisure”. For most of us, the prospects of sleeping in late, lounging on the beach, improving our golf scores, living on cruise ships, and lazing about all day may sound good for a short time, but they hold little allure for us in the long-term.

So, what really matters in life? I can boil the answer to this question down to six major themes:

  1. Wealth
  2. Health
  3. Relationships
  4. Contribution/Achievement
  5. Meaning
  6. Happiness

First a little discussion on the themes.

Wealth – some have more than others, some have less, but most of the people I run across agree that while it can be used to pay for nice homes, fast cars, and fine dining, it can’t purchase meaning. Beyond a middle-income level, the amount of money you have bears little correlation to how happy you are.

Health – is critically important to enjoying life. Good health is a combination of luck, a healthy lifestyle, and medical care.

Relationships – are very important. Everyone I meet clearly values their relationships with friends and family members and sees that these relationships are key to their emotional wellbeing.

Contribution/Achievement – for most of us reading this blog we are fortunate in life and seek to give back, make a positive contribution, even leave a legacy. Helping others as we’ve been helped is important to us.

Meaning – work that has meaning is important to our sense of well being. We want to feel that we are making a real difference in the world.

Happiness – everyone I’ve ever met wants to be happy. True happiness can’t be bought – it has to be lived!

As you contemplate these themes and set your goals for 2015, you might choose to volunteer or work on projects that make the world a better place. You might choose to change to a job or a career where you have more opportunity to serve. For me, I still teach and give classes, but I focus more on advising people how they can have a great rest of their lives rather than just work harder and “make more money.”

Reflecting on life’s purpose should start when you’re young—and never stop. I served on the board of the Peter Drucker Foundation for 10 years, so I had a chance to observe Peter personally. He worked until his death at age 95! He was never interested in retiring. He was interested in working to make the world a better place. Through his example, I learned that making a difference means more than, and is very different from, making a living.

Think about your life. Now’s a great time to start planning the rest of it. How can you make a contribution? How can you find meaning? What will make you happy? How can you make this time count—for yourself, the people around you, and the world?

How to Avoid Perceived Conflict of Interest and Increase Integrity

In the competitive world of business, the lines between personal and professional connections can sometimes blur, and when this happens, it can create a perceived conflict of interest. For example, picture an executive at a mid-sized tech company tasked with selecting a consultancy firm who can help them develop a winning growth strategy. The executive’s sibling happens to be a business consultant specializing in the tech industry and has been wildly successful in the past. As the management team evaluates proposals from various consultancies, the executive decides to invite their sibling’s firm to submit a proposal, confident in their past successes.

This situation could easily raise eyebrows amongst people as they grow concerned about a potential conflict of interest. As a leader, your gut instinct is to shut it down, but how do you know if this is an actual conflict and not just a perceived conflict of interest?

What is a Perceived Conflict of Interest?

At some point, you’ve probably heard the phrase “conflict of interest” tossed around in your workplace. But have you ever considered the possibility of a “perceived” conflict of interest?

A perceived conflict of interest can arise from personal relationships, financial interests, or even just the mere appearance of impropriety. Unlike an actual conflict of interest, which involves a tangible benefit or relationship directly impacting someone’s decision-making, perceived conflicts of interest are rooted in a potential or perceived conflict. For example, a CEO giving a board seat to their cousin might be an actual conflict of interest, while a CEO having lunch with their cousin who happens to work for a potential vendor is a perceived conflict of interest.

Perceived conflicts of interest are like invisible monsters lurking in the shadows of your business  that have the power to erode trust, create suspicion, and even lower morale among your team members. Even though they may not be real, they can still wreak havoc on your company’s reputation. That’s why it’s essential to address and prevent these sneaky monsters in your workplace. 

How to Avoid a Perceived Conflict of Interest 

Set a Transparent and Proactive Policy

A successful business is built on trust and integrity, which is why avoiding a perceived conflict of interest is so important. The first step in achieving this is establishing a transparent and proactive policy that clearly defines a conflict of interest and how employees can disclose potential conflicts.


When creating your conflict of interest policy, ensure it:

  • Defines what constitutes a conflict of interest and provides examples.
  • Provides guidance on how employees can disclose potential conflicts of interest.
  • Encourages open communication and emphasizes the importance of transparency.
  • Outlines the consequences of failing to disclose conflicts of interest. 
  • Creates a process for evaluating and addressing potential conflicts of interest.

Addressing potential conflicts before they escalate into actual issues is a proactive approach that can save your organization from the fallout of misunderstandings and safeguard its reputation.

Provide Guidance and Training

To ensure your business runs like a well-oiled machine, it’s essential to provide your employees with proper training on perceived conflicts of interest. This is why regular training is a must, and it shouldn’t just be a one-time event during employee onboarding.. 

To really make an impact, you need to schedule refresher sessions that keep employees informed about their responsibilities and the potential consequences of failing to avoid a perceived conflict of interest. It’s like getting a tune-up for your car to keep it running smoothly and prevent breakdowns.

Of course, training is only effective if it’s understood, which is why you need to get creative with the delivery. In-person sessions are great, but supplementing them with written guidelines, visual aids, and quizzes to assess comprehension can help reinforce the message. On top of this, it’s crucial to create an environment where employees feel comfortable asking questions and seeking clarification on sensitive topics. Without this open and honest communication, employees may be hesitant to ask for help or clarification, leading to misunderstandings and even conflicts.

Monitor and Address Concerns

To prevent a perceived conflict of interest from turning into a real conflict, it’s essential to keep an eye out for warning signs. This means regularly monitoring employees’ financial disclosures and other relevant information to identify any potential conflicts. By being vigilant and proactive, you can nip conflicts in the bud before they have a chance to cause damage.

When a potential conflict of interest is identified, it’s crucial to address it promptly and effectively. This may involve taking action to minimize the perception of a conflict, such as disclosing it to relevant parties or limiting involvement in certain decisions. In more serious cases, it may be necessary to remove the employee from the situation entirely. The key is to act quickly and decisively to prevent the conflict from causing harm to the business or its employees.

The Gripples of the Housing Levy

On the 26th of June, 2023, the President granted assent to the Finance Bill, 2023, which proposes many changes. Among them, the Bill proposed an amendment to the Employment Act, by introducing a levy of a 1.5 percent deduction of an employee’s gross salary towards the National Housing Development Fund (NHDF) to fund Kenya’s affordable housing initiative. Employers will also be required to match the 1.5% housing deduction which will fund the government’s Affordable Housing Program.

Housing Levy 2023

While undergoing the third reading, this controversial proposal received a backlash with a heated debate between the Kenya Kwanza parliamentary representatives against their counterparts from the opposition coalition. 184 members of the national assembly voted in support of the introduction of this housing levy tax while only 72 members remained on the opposition.

What you need to know about the Housing Levy.

The National Assembly Finance and Planning Committee recommended an amendment in the Finance Bill, 2023 to convert the housing fund into a levy, which effectively means that the money will not be refunded after it is collected. Apprise of this and objections raised by the shareholders, the committee agreed to amend the proposal on Housing Fund by making it a levy as opposed to a contribution so that the funds can be appropriated directly to fund the housing initiative under the Bottom-Up Economic Transformation Agenda.

In response to the stakeholders’ submissions, the rate was successfully reduced to a manageable rate of 1.5 percent to appease taxpayers. The levy is now shifted into tax, which will now be collected by the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) alongside other levies.

This amendment removes the previous options for employees to purchase a home under an affordable scheme or transfer their contributions to a retirement benefits scheme or a registered provident fund. This will directly improve the living conditions for residents, and the issues of housing affordability will be addressed, subsequently stimulating economic growth in the construction and housing sectors through job creation for the youths.

Additionally, they can no longer transfer their contributions to their spouse nor children; however, they will be able to receive their contributions in cash after a period of 7 years.

Compliance With the housing levy in Kenya

The Finance Bill 2023 previously proposed that the contribution towards the housing fund initiative be capped at KES 2,500 each, for both the employee and employer. The recent move to reduce the rate to an uncapped rate of 1.5 percent will majorly affect employees earning above KES 166,667 as they will be forced to contribute more. The table below further explains this.

Gross Income AmountEmployee contribution (1.5%)Employer (1.5%)
50,000750750
100,0001,5001,500
150,0002,2502,250
180,0002,7002,700
200,0003,0003,000

It’s an employer’s obligation to set aside the monthly payment for each employee not later than nine working days after the end of the month in which the payments are due, the amount comprises of the employee’s and the employer’s payment. This means the housing levy will form part of the statutory deductions.  Any employer who fails to comply with the housing levy provision shall be liable to payment of a penalty equivalent to two percent of the unpaid funds for every month the same remains unpaid.

The 6 Most Important Things in Life

Learn about the most important things in life and why they are essential to achieve happiness and fulfillment

In today’s digital world, many of us are thrown by social status, materialistic items and luxuries – and how can you blame us? We are constantly being shown that the image of perfection includes these things, with edited Instagram images and reality TV shows highlighting the elite.

In reality, however, status, designer products and expensive items are worth nothing; they won’t make you happy nor healthy. So, regardless of where you are in the world, the most important things on your list should include the following.

1. Health

Being healthy is the single, most important part of our existence – without good health, our lives can be cut short. That said, it’s important not to take good health for granted and feed our bodies nutrients that they deserve by eating a balanced diet and engaging in regular physical activity. According to the US Department of Health and Human Services (HSS), by maintaining a healthy lifestyle, you can ‘reduce your risk of chronic diseases (like heart disease and cancer), and promote your overall health.’

2. Family

While you may sometimes argue and get annoyed with your family, they are your unit and the ones that you can turn to in times of happiness and sorrow. No matter what you go through with your family, they will always be there to guide and support you and to help you learn and grow as a person.

https://1b5c4b012d562e0fbec35a25dc3251a8.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html

The love from a family member is unconditional and should not be taken for granted. Some people go through life without truly appreciating just how important having their family’s support is and spend the majority their existence feeling unhappy. So, if you don’t usually show your family how much they mean to you, now is the time to start!

3. Friends

Just like family, friends are a vital part of our existence and happiness. They are people that can share the best parts of your life with you and will be there as a confidant when you need to talk about personal issues.

While real friends are hard to come by, most will have a handful of trusted friends that they can rely on. And even though you may outgrow certain friends during different stages of your life, you will have opportunities to form new relationships with people that you come across.

SEE ALSO

Proven Ways to Make Friends at Work

4. Love

Love is the epicentre of every aspect of your life – it doesn’t just relate to having a partner. You will love your partner in a unique way, but you will also have unchangeable affection for your family and friends.

https://1b5c4b012d562e0fbec35a25dc3251a8.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html

Love is also the feeling that will drive you throughout your career, extracurricular activities, interests and hobbies. Moreover, you will experience love in its varying forms; you may go on holiday and fall in love with a particular city, cuisine or culture. What’s vital is that you embrace everything that you love and enjoy.

5. Purpose

https://1b5c4b012d562e0fbec35a25dc3251a8.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html

Having a purpose is a fundamental component of living a fulfilling life. Without purpose, we won’t have the motivation to achieve great things or even do something simple such as getting out of bed in the morning. According to psychologist Steve Taylor, not having a purpose ‘makes us more vulnerable to boredom, anxiety, and depression.’

Meanwhile, having a strong sense of purpose can have a positive effect on our lives. If you take a page out of the books of successful entrepreneurs, most of them made it by having a drive and a sense of purpose. They worked hard because they were confident of what they could achieve – and this purpose is something that we need to follow to feel accomplished in life.

6. Passion

Along with purpose comes passion; our desires, our dreams and our hopes in life. When you’re passionate about something, you’re going to work hard to achieve it. For example, Huda Kattan was a self-established makeup artist, but her passion for cosmetics pushed her to build a beauty empire that’s now worth over $600 million.

That said, passion looks different for everyone; some people will be passionate about giving back to society, while others will have a passion for personal gain. Just ensure that your passion is for a good cause and that it brings joy not only to yourself but to others, too.